<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is an Acceptable Cost Per Lead?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.skylinetradeshowtips.com/what-is-an-acceptable-cost-per-lead/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.skylinetradeshowtips.com/what-is-an-acceptable-cost-per-lead/</link>
	<description>Dedicated to Your Exhibiting Success</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:56:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Flavin</title>
		<link>http://www.skylinetradeshowtips.com/what-is-an-acceptable-cost-per-lead/comment-page-1/#comment-1574</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Flavin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 22:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skylinetradeshowtips.com/?p=370#comment-1574</guid>
		<description>Hi Stephanie,

This method is focused on ROI-based measurement of your trade show results. 

Look at steps #5 &amp; #6 to calculate the ratio. In this example, we expect $125,000 of new revenue generated as a result of exhibiting at this show. If we spent $16,250 to exhibit at the show, our ROI is 7.69:1 or for every $1, $7.69 generated ($125,000 / $16,2500 = 7.69). 

There are several other ways to measure your trade show program, such as ROO (return on objectives). 

Check out our &quot;Trade Show Tips&quot; for more info. at http://www.skyline.com/Trade-Show-Tips/ and I&#039;m happy to answer any other questions as you calculate your trade show success!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Stephanie,</p>
<p>This method is focused on ROI-based measurement of your trade show results. </p>
<p>Look at steps #5 &amp; #6 to calculate the ratio. In this example, we expect $125,000 of new revenue generated as a result of exhibiting at this show. If we spent $16,250 to exhibit at the show, our ROI is 7.69:1 or for every $1, $7.69 generated ($125,000 / $16,2500 = 7.69). </p>
<p>There are several other ways to measure your trade show program, such as ROO (return on objectives). </p>
<p>Check out our &#8220;Trade Show Tips&#8221; for more info. at <a href="http://www.skyline.com/Trade-Show-Tips/" rel="nofollow">http://www.skyline.com/Trade-Show-Tips/</a> and I&#8217;m happy to answer any other questions as you calculate your trade show success!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephanie</title>
		<link>http://www.skylinetradeshowtips.com/what-is-an-acceptable-cost-per-lead/comment-page-1/#comment-1503</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 14:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skylinetradeshowtips.com/?p=370#comment-1503</guid>
		<description>Hi!

I&#039;m new to this so I was wondering how you got the following:

7.) ROI = 7.69:1 or for every $1, $7.69 generated

I&#039;m looking for key calcutions to use when reviewing the success of trade shows attended. Any help would be appreciated.

Thanks,
~Stephanie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m new to this so I was wondering how you got the following:</p>
<p>7.) ROI = 7.69:1 or for every $1, $7.69 generated</p>
<p>I&#8217;m looking for key calcutions to use when reviewing the success of trade shows attended. Any help would be appreciated.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
~Stephanie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Flavin</title>
		<link>http://www.skylinetradeshowtips.com/what-is-an-acceptable-cost-per-lead/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Flavin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 14:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skylinetradeshowtips.com/?p=370#comment-29</guid>
		<description>Hi Lori,

You are right on! Studies show that the close ratio goes up based on the number of contacts with a prospect. Trade shows are a great way to set meetings &amp; set agreed-upon next steps with clients &amp; prospects, thus moving the sales cycle forward &amp; closing sales.

Closing the Sale Statistics
2% of Sales are made on the 1st contact 
3% of sales are made on the 2nd contact 
5% of sales are made on the 3rd contact 
10% of sales are made on the 4th contact 
80% of sales are made on the 5th to 12th Contact 

Sales Staff Performance Statistics
48% of Sales people never follow-up with a prospect 
25% of Sales People make only a second contact and then stop 
12% of sales people make three contacts and stop 
Only 10% of sales people make more than three contacts</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Lori,</p>
<p>You are right on! Studies show that the close ratio goes up based on the number of contacts with a prospect. Trade shows are a great way to set meetings &amp; set agreed-upon next steps with clients &amp; prospects, thus moving the sales cycle forward &amp; closing sales.</p>
<p>Closing the Sale Statistics<br />
2% of Sales are made on the 1st contact<br />
3% of sales are made on the 2nd contact<br />
5% of sales are made on the 3rd contact<br />
10% of sales are made on the 4th contact<br />
80% of sales are made on the 5th to 12th Contact </p>
<p>Sales Staff Performance Statistics<br />
48% of Sales people never follow-up with a prospect<br />
25% of Sales People make only a second contact and then stop<br />
12% of sales people make three contacts and stop<br />
Only 10% of sales people make more than three contacts</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lori Rentfrow</title>
		<link>http://www.skylinetradeshowtips.com/what-is-an-acceptable-cost-per-lead/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Lori Rentfrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 15:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skylinetradeshowtips.com/?p=370#comment-16</guid>
		<description>I find your numbers right on for lead retrival.  Do you have something simular for booking appointments at the event.  I find that percentage of lead to sale goes up to 65-70%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find your numbers right on for lead retrival.  Do you have something simular for booking appointments at the event.  I find that percentage of lead to sale goes up to 65-70%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Thimmesch</title>
		<link>http://www.skylinetradeshowtips.com/what-is-an-acceptable-cost-per-lead/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Thimmesch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 23:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skylinetradeshowtips.com/?p=370#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Roger,

Thanks for the insightful comment.  Proving ROI to financial execs is an essential part of all marketing, let alone trade show marketing, but because trade shows are now the largest B2B marketing expense, they are looked at even closer.

I think you are right to try to share the value of the sale against the investment of other lead sources if there were multiple touches that led to the sale.  Here&#039;s how I would value the trade show lead:
1.  If the lead is not split among other sources, then it gets all the credit.  That&#039;s the easy one.
2.  If the lead is split among multiple sources, you could divide the sales revenue against each lead source&#039;s costs to refine each lead source&#039;s marketing ROI.  Better still, if you can, give greater weight to the lead source that did most to advance the sales cycle.  For example, if you recorded on your lead card that a trade show lead gave definite plans to buy and wanted a follow up meeting scheduled, that gives greater emphasis to the trade show lead.
3.  Was the lead initiated at the trade show?  Then even if there are lead touches after that, then the trade show lead could get a higher weighting.
4.  Are you in an industry that has a high ratio of repeat business?  At that point, it becomes even harder to establish credit for lead sources, because the buying cycle is actually a buying marathon.
5.  Call me naive, but I don&#039;t count the cost of the sales call follow up in any of the calculations for marketing ROI, as the follow up calls are going to happen regardless, and often come from other budgets than marketing or demand generation. 

Thanks again for adding your thoughts to this important facet of trade show marketing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roger,</p>
<p>Thanks for the insightful comment.  Proving ROI to financial execs is an essential part of all marketing, let alone trade show marketing, but because trade shows are now the largest B2B marketing expense, they are looked at even closer.</p>
<p>I think you are right to try to share the value of the sale against the investment of other lead sources if there were multiple touches that led to the sale.  Here&#8217;s how I would value the trade show lead:<br />
1.  If the lead is not split among other sources, then it gets all the credit.  That&#8217;s the easy one.<br />
2.  If the lead is split among multiple sources, you could divide the sales revenue against each lead source&#8217;s costs to refine each lead source&#8217;s marketing ROI.  Better still, if you can, give greater weight to the lead source that did most to advance the sales cycle.  For example, if you recorded on your lead card that a trade show lead gave definite plans to buy and wanted a follow up meeting scheduled, that gives greater emphasis to the trade show lead.<br />
3.  Was the lead initiated at the trade show?  Then even if there are lead touches after that, then the trade show lead could get a higher weighting.<br />
4.  Are you in an industry that has a high ratio of repeat business?  At that point, it becomes even harder to establish credit for lead sources, because the buying cycle is actually a buying marathon.<br />
5.  Call me naive, but I don&#8217;t count the cost of the sales call follow up in any of the calculations for marketing ROI, as the follow up calls are going to happen regardless, and often come from other budgets than marketing or demand generation. </p>
<p>Thanks again for adding your thoughts to this important facet of trade show marketing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Lewis</title>
		<link>http://www.skylinetradeshowtips.com/what-is-an-acceptable-cost-per-lead/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 20:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skylinetradeshowtips.com/?p=370#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Michael,

Great, actionable information here, with a formula that makes sense.  One issue that my customers (especially those with complex sales cycles) have come across when presenting similar calculations to the finance execs : sales revenue cannot be attributed to the tradeshow lead alone, since it is unlikely that the prospect shows up at the booth and makes the decision to buy right then and there.  To come up with an accurate ROI number, you need to isolate other factors such as sales visits that followed the trade show, webinars or conferences that the lead may have attended, email campaigns they responded to, etc.  

If you argue that a percentage of the sale can be attributed to the trade show, and come to some agreement as to what percentage sounds reasonable and fair, the finance executives may accept your ROI calculation more readily.

Have you come across this issue, and if so, how have you solved it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael,</p>
<p>Great, actionable information here, with a formula that makes sense.  One issue that my customers (especially those with complex sales cycles) have come across when presenting similar calculations to the finance execs : sales revenue cannot be attributed to the tradeshow lead alone, since it is unlikely that the prospect shows up at the booth and makes the decision to buy right then and there.  To come up with an accurate ROI number, you need to isolate other factors such as sales visits that followed the trade show, webinars or conferences that the lead may have attended, email campaigns they responded to, etc.  </p>
<p>If you argue that a percentage of the sale can be attributed to the trade show, and come to some agreement as to what percentage sounds reasonable and fair, the finance executives may accept your ROI calculation more readily.</p>
<p>Have you come across this issue, and if so, how have you solved it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

